ISIR - Universitè Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6 - France Room H20
Author: F. Fontana
OCT. 12 - The meeting starts at 2.30pm
Participants:
UNIVR: F. Fontana, M. Civolani McGill University: Y. Visell AAU: R. Nordahl, S. Serafin, L. Turchet INRIA: G. Cirio, T. Regia Corte UPMC: V. Hayward, N. Ouarti, A. Berrezag
The Coordinator opens the meeting.
2.40pm Management issues
- VH presents his collaborators. He introduces Amir Berrezag as a new member, who substitutes former contractor George Dietz currently going through health problems. Finally, he outlines a possible logistics for the review meeting of the next day, including lunchtime and visit to the demo room. The attendees agree with his plan.
- FF asks about the current position of the consortium about the disclosure level of deliverables, as a question mark is still open concerning the level of protection of D2.1 and D3.1. VH and YV, respectively having responsibility of such deliverables, agree in leaving the content public (PU). The coordinator, hence, agrees in clearing out during the review meeting that D2.1, D3.1, and D4.1, will be published on the project website by the end of the reporting activity.
- Meeting of the General Assembly. FF reminds that another question mark holds concerning the possible amendment of the CA, due to changes in the protection level of products engineered by McGill University and UPMC. Notwithstanding any request in this sense coming from the consortium, the assembly decides to leave the CA as it is. The meeting is closed
- FF points out that the activities and current state of advancement of the project are very clear from the deliverables and the draft of the periodic report, both generated in September. In this sense there is no need to issue this point further, until the review meeting will take place
3.15pm Preparation of the review meeting
- FF shows the slides he has produced for the review concerning the introduction to NIW. Comments and improvements are suggested by the attendants, and are implemented accordingly
- All participants show, in their turn, their own presentations. Suggestions are gathered and implemented accordingly
- A couple of slides on the use of resources are prepared by FF, based on current inputs on person/months coming from the beneficiaries
- A discussion is started concerning the plans for the second year. Since much, about the direction NIW will take, depends on the feedback coming from the reviewers and the project officer, the consortium decides to prepare an early plan that can be taken as a platform for discussion during the review. Hence, two slides are prepared: one, presenting the current level of exchange of hardware, software, and methodologies among beneficiaries; another, showing the activities the consortium wants to do during the second year based on the expected exchange of research personnel that will occur during the coming months
- The whole cluster of slides is finally reviewed and put together, to check their consistency with the agenda and timelines of the review meeting
6.00pm Set up of the demos
- The attendants move downstairs to the labs. VH shows the facilities running at ISIR.
- Four demos are set up for the following day: AAU's sonic pavement, UNIVR's sonic shoes, McGill University's floor tiles, and UPMC's haptic soles. Assembling and checking the settings keeps the consortium busy for the rest of the afternoon and evening
9.00pm All demos working, the meeting is closed.
OCT. 13 - The meeting starts at 9.15pm
Participants:
UNIVR: F. Fontana, M. Civolani McGill University: Y. Visell AAU: S. Serafin, L. Turchet INRIA: A. Lecuyer, G. Cirio, T. Regia Corte UPMC: V. Hayward, A. Berrezag Project Officer: P. Hearn Reviewers: S. O'Modhrain, C. Preusche, S. Glasauer
Plans to welcome the reviewers and set up everything for the meeting.
All day will be devoted to the review meeting, whose official agenda is reported here below for convenience
10.15am - Welcome and tour de table 10.25am - Introduction to the NIW project - F. Fontana 10.45am - Management and financial overview - F. Fontana, A. Lecuyer, S. Serafin, V. Hayward, Y. Visell 11.05am - Technical overview - F. Fontana 11.15am - Highlight 1 - Sonic feedback and actuated shoes and demo - F. Fontana, S. Serafin 11.45pm - Highlight 2 - Haptic hardware engineering: shoes and tiles - V. Hayward, Y. Visell 12.15pm - Highlight 3 - Multimodal feedback and immersive interaction - A. Lecuyer, Y. Visell 12.45pm - Hands on demo session 1.05pm - Lunch 2.05pm - Plans for year 2 2.25pm - General discussion 2.55pm - Private meeting of review panel 3.40pm - Feedback and close 4.05pm - End of the review
The agenda is followed, except for minor modifications decided in due course.
The project officer thanks, also on behalf of the reviewers, the consortium for the organization of the review meeting. The review panel leaves the meeting place.
4.45pm - Preliminary considerations
The consortium tries to capture the main points of the review. Preliminary comments on the project's state of advancement, which have been anticipated by the reviewers, seem to be essentially positive. On the other hand, the consortium is challenged to better group the different components together during the second year. Some late brainstorming is attempted, whose outcome is left to the following day.
The meeting closes at 5.30pm
OCT. 14 - The meeting starts at 10.15am
Participants:
UNIVR: F. Fontana, M. Civolani McGill University: Y. Visell AAU: S. Serafin, L. Turchet INRIA: A. Lecuyer, G. Cirio, T. Regia Corte UPMC: V. Hayward, A. Berrezag
10.30am Management issues
- FF tries to wrap up considerations on the feedback coming from the reviewers. Overall, the impression is that the project had a positive review. The activity made so far has been judged satisfactory, resulting in multiple components all representing the state of the art in the respective topic. Conversely, the reviewers' concern is about how the consortium will be able to glue such multiple diverse and manifold experiences into some more coherent framework during the second year. Furthermore, official requests consist in re-submitting D2.1, currently rejected, as well as preparing D7.1 containing information about the structure of the project website, and comprehensive of the statistics about the visits. The consortium agrees with such general considerations.
- FF solicits the compilation if the financial forms that have to be included in the periodic report. The coordinator, hence, will make the related form templates available to all beneficiaries by Oct. 20, while expecting to receive their feedback by Oct. 30
- FF suggests to have all the missing material (i.e. D2.1, D7.1, and periodic report) ready by Oct. 30, in a way to deliver everything in one shot while having sufficient time to further improve the same material before the 60 day deadline expires.
- FF suggests to keep track of the running missions online. For this reason, he will simply put a text file available in the website, that every beneficiary will fill up with person name, origin, destination, dates, and short motivations of the mission. In this way, the consortium can have a running image of the state of the research exchanges occurring during the project implementation.
- AL underlines the granted possibility to update the deliverables with content also after they have been published. This possibility represent an optimal solution to the problem of disclosing research at public deliverable level, before presentation and/or publication at conferences and journals. Holding this possibility, INRIA has no longer the problem of re-discussing the disclosure level of deliverable 5.1. The same possibility is positively judged by the rest of the consortium.
11.15 Dissemination issues
The consortium is already at the center of an intense dissemination activity, holding also several requests for participation of NIW to events in the field of virtual reality and interaction design. One of these requests come from Laval Virtual, currently one of the most interesting events in Europe for the demonstration and dissemination of man-machine interfaces involving aspects of virtual reality.
- AL has submitted a proposal about walking in VR at a call for tutorials on the 2010 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality
- AL has been invited to give a tutorial on haptic in VR's at Laval Virtual in Laval, France
- FF has been asked to participate with NIW at Laval Virtual in Laval, France
- FF has been asked to organize the next HAID conference.
- VH is interested in participating to the Eurohaptics and Worldhaptics conferences, deadline January 2010
- SS will co-organize Haid 2010 using project's "Other" costs. Proposed date for the conference is September 2010. Further info will be submitted by SS to the consortium.
Other plans for research missions are issued. Among these, GC's visit to McGil University as well as TRC's mission to UNIVR.
12.00 Long-term scenario
FF urges to try sharing a common development scenario for the project. Ideas are gathered from the consortium
- FF: "virtual pathway" -> locomotion, postural rehabilitation - VH: nano-presence -> interacting with nano materials - non visual contribution in locomotion tasks - more basic research in contact modeling with different material
FF tries to find common acceptance on the virtual pathway scenario, as it could gather together diverse components that are running within the project
12.30 Book
An initial discussion is started, concerning the preparation of a book as stated in the project grant agreement.
- YV candidates himself for preparing an initial statement on the book. Idea: contacting people working on new frontiers of walking, in a way to collect several tutorial/survey articles on the broader topic of walking.
13.00 Closing issues
The next meeting is scheduled to take place next February in Verona, hosted by UNIVR.
Possible following candidates: Montreal (July 2010), Rennes (October 2010).
P.G. Adamczyk, S.H. Collins, and A.D. Kuo. The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(20):3953, 2006.
J.M. Adrien. The missing link: modal synthesis. 1991.
H. Iwata and. Walking about virtual environments on an infinate floor. In Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality, 1999.
S. aus der Wiesche. Computational slosh dynamics: theory and industrial application. Computational Mechanics, 30:374–387, 2003.
Federico Avanzini and Paolo Crosato. Integrating physically based sound models in a multimodal rendering architecture: Research articles. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds, 17(3-4):411–419, 2006.
F. Avanzini and D. Rocchesso. Controlling material properties in physical models of sounding objects. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2001, pages 91–94, La Habana, Cuba, 2001.
F. Avanzini and D. Rocchesso. Modeling Collision Sounds: Non-linear Contact Force. Proc. COST-G6 Conf. Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-01), pages 61–66, 2001.
F. Avanzini and D. Rocchesso. Modeling collision sounds: non-linear contact force. In Proc. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-01), pages 61–66, Limerick, December 2001.
F. Avanzini and D. Rocchesso. Physical modeling of impacts: theory and experiments on contact time and spectral centroid. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Sound and Music Computing (SMC'04), pages 287–293, 2004.
W. Benjamin. The Arcades Project. Harvard Univ. Press, 1999.
S. Bilbao. Robust physical modeling sound synthesis for nonlinear systems. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 24(2):32–41, March 2007.
J. Blauert. Spatial Hearing: the Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.
G. Borin, G. De Poli, and D. Rocchesso. Elimination of Delay-Free Loops in Discrete-Time Models of Nonlinear Acoustic Systems. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(5):597–605, September 2000.
J. Borwick, editor. Loudspeaker and Headphone Handbook. Focal Press, Oxford (UK), 1998.
R. Bresin, S. Delle Monache, F. Fontana, S. Papetti, P. Polotti, and Y. Visell. Auditory feedback from continuous control of crumpling sound synthesis. In CHI 2008 Workshop on Sonic Interaction Design, Florence, Italy, Apr. 5-10 2008. ACM.
P. A. Cabe and J. B. Pittenger. Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1):313–324, 2000.
C. Carello, K. L. Anderson, and A. J. Kunkler-Peck. Perception of object length by sound. Psychological Science, 9(3):211–214, May 1998.
A. Chaigne and J. Kergomard. Acoustique des Instruments de Musique. Belin, 2008.
M. Chion. Audio-Vision. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, USA, 1994.
P. Chueng and P. Marsden. Designing Auditory Spaces to Support Sense of Place: The Role of Expectation. CSCW Workshop: The Role of Place in Shaping Virtual Community, 2002.
J. Edward Colgate and J. Michael Brown. Factors Affecting the Z-Width of a Haptic Display. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pages 3205–3210, San Diego, May 1994.
P. R. Cook. Physically informed sonic modeling (PHISM): Synthesis of percussive sounds. Computer Music Journal, 21(3):38–49, 1997.
P. R. Cook. Modeling Bill's gait: Analysis and parametric synthesis of walking sounds. In Proc. Audio Engineering Society 22 Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio, Espoo, Finland, July 2002. AES.
P.R. Cook. Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications. AK Peters, Ltd., 2002.
D. H. Cress. Terrain considerations and data base development for the design and testing of devices to detect intruder-induced ground motion. Technical Report M-78-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1978.
M. de Certeau. The Practice of Everyday Life. Univ. of California Press, 1984.
T. Delbruck, A. M. Whatley, R. Douglas, K. Eng, K. Hepp, and P. F. M. J. V. Verschure. A tactile luminous floor for an interactive autonomous space. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55:433–443, 2007.
A. DeWitt and R. Bresin. Sound design for affective interaction. In Affective computing and intelligent interaction ACII 2007, pages 523–533, 2007.
N. Diolaiti, C. Melchiorri, and S. Stramigioli. Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 21(5):925–935, 2005.
C. Drioli and D. Rocchesso. Acoustic rendering of particle-based simulation of liquids in motion. In Proceedings of the 12th DAFX Conference, 2009.
P. Dupont, V. Hayward, B. Armstrong, and F. Altpeter. Single state elastoplastic friction models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(5):787–792, 2002.
Douglas Enright, Stephen Marschner, and Ronald Fedkiw. Animation and rendering of complex water surfaces. In SIGGRAPH '02: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 736–744, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. (doi:10.1145/566570.566645)
A. J. Farnell. Marching onwards – procedural synthetic footsteps for video games and animation. In pd Convention, 2007.
P. Flores, J. Ambrósio, J. Claro, and H. Lankarani. Influence of the contact-impact force model on the dynamic response of multi-body systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers-K, 220(1):21–34, 2006.
P. Flores, J.C. Pimenta Claro, and H. M. Lankarani. Kinematics and Dynamics of Multibody Systems with Imperfect Joints: Models and Case Studies. Springer, 2008.
F. Fontana and R. Bresin. Physics-based sound synthesis and control: crushing, walking and running by crumpling sounds. In Proc. Colloquium on Musical Informatics, pages 109–114, Florence, Italy, May 2003.
D. J. Freed. Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive events. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(1):311–322, 1990.
J. Freeman and J. Lessiter. Hear, There and Everywhere: The Effects of Multichannel Audio on Presence. Proceedings of ICAD 2001, pages 231–234, 2001.
P. Froehlich, R. Simon, and L. Baille. Mobile spatial interaction special issue. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (In press), 2008.
W. W. Gaver. How Do We Hear in the World? Explorations in Ecological Acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5(4):285–313, Apr. 1993.
B. L. Giordano and R. Bresin. Walking and playing: what's the origin of emotional expressiveness in music? In M. Baroni, A. R. Addessi, R. Caterina, and M. Costa, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC9), Bologna, Italy, 2006.
B. L. Giordano and S. McAdams. Material identification of real impact sounds: effects of size variation in steel, glass, wood and plexiglass plates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2):1171–1181, 2006.
B. L. Giordano, S. McAdams, and D. Rocchesso. Integration of acoustical information in the perception of impacted sound sources: the role of information accuracy and exploitability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Accepted for publication, 2008.
B. L. Giordano, S. McAdams, Y. Visell, J. Cooperstock, H.-Y. Yao, and V. Hayward. Non-visual identification of walking grounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5):3412, 2008.
M. Grassi. Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2):274–284, 2005.
J.D. Harry, J. B. Niemi, A.A. Priplata, and J.J Collins. Balancing act. IEEE Spectrum, April 2005.
V. Hayward. Physically-based haptic synthesis. In Haptic Rendering: Foundations, Algorithms and Applications.
V. Hayward and K. Maclean. Do it yourself haptics, part I. IEEE Robotics and Automation, December 2007.
J. Hollerbach. Locomotion interfaces and rendering. In M. Lin and M. Otaduy, editors, Haptic Rendering: Foundations, Algorithms and Applications. A K Peters, Ltd, 2008.
M. M. J. Houben, A. Kohlrausch, and D. J. Hermes. Perception of the size and speed of rolling balls by sound. Speech Communication, 43:331–345, 2004.
M. M. J. Houben, A. Kohlrausch, and D. J. Hermes. The contribution of spectral and temporal information to the auditory perception of the size and speed of rolling balls. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91(6):1007–1015, 2005.
Olivier Houix. Categorisation auditive des sources sonores. PhD thesis, Université du Maine, France, 2003.
K. H. Hunt and F. R. E. Crossley. Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. ASME J. Applied Mech., pages 440–445, June 1975.
H. Iwata. Haptic interface. In A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, editors, The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., New York, 2nd edition, 2008.
L. A. Jones and N. B. Sarter. Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50(1):90–111, 2008.
B. Kapralos, D. Zikovitz, M. Jenkin, and L.R. Harris. Auditory cues in the perception of self-motion. 116th AES convention, 2004.
R. L. Klatzky, D. K. Pai, and E. P. Krotkov. Perception of material from contact sounds. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment, 9(4):399–410, 2000.
A. J. Kunkler-Peck and M. T. Turvey. Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1):279–294, 2000.
G. Kuwabara and K. Kono. Restitution coefficient in a collision between two spheres. Jap. J. of Appl. Phys., 26(8):1230–1233, 1987.
S. Lakatos, S. McAdams, and R. Caussé. The representation of auditory source characteristics: simple geometric form. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(8):1180–1190, 1997.
P. Larsson, D. Västfjäll, and M. Kleiner. Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments. Proceedings of Seventh Annual Workshop Presence, pages 252–258, 2004.
M.-Y. Lee, K.-S. Soon, and C.-F. Lin. New computer protocol with subsensory stimulation and visual/auditory biofeedback for balance assessment in amputees. J. of Computers, 4(10):1005–1011, October 2009.
X. Li, R. J. Logan, and R. E. Pastore. Perception of acoustic source characteristics: Walking sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6):3036–3049, 1991.
R. A. Lutfi and C. J. Liu. Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122:1017–1028, 2007.
R. A. Lutfi and E. L. Oh. Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck–clamped bar. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(6):3647–3656, 1997.
R. A. Lutfi, E. Oh, E. Storm, and J. M. Alexander. Classification and identification of recorded and synthesized impact sounds by practiced listeners, musicians, and nonmusicians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118:393, 2005.
R. A. Lutfi. Auditory detection of hollowness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(2):1010–1019, 2001.
R. A. Lutfi. Human sound source identification. In W. A. Yost, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper, editors, Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, pages 13–42. Springer, New York, NY, 2007.
D. W. Marhefka and D. E. Orin. A compliant contact model with nonlinear damping for simulation of robotic systems. IEEE trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 29(6):566–572, November 1999.
S. McAdams, A. Chaigne, and V. Roussarie. The psychomecanics of simulated sound sources: Material properties of impacted bars. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(3):1306–1320, 2004.
M. Minnaert. On musical air bubbles and the sounds of running water. Philos. Mag., 16:235–248, 1933.
E.R. Miranda and M.M. Wanderley. New Digital Musical Instruments: Control And Interaction Beyond the Keyboard. AR Editions, 2006.
Proc. of the 4th Intl. Mobile Music Workshop, Amsterdam, NL, May 2007.
Stefano Delle Monache, Delphine Devallez, Carlo Drioli, Federico Fontana, Stefano Papetti, Pietro Polotti, and Davide Rocchesso. Sound synthesis tools for sound design. Deliverable 2.2, CLOSED project, 2008. Available at http://closed.ircam.fr.
S.J. Morris and J.A. Paradiso. Shoe-integrated sensor system for wireless gait analysis and real-time feedback. Proceedings of the 2nd Joint IEEE EMBS (Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society) and BMES (the Biomedical Engineering Society) Conference, pages 2468–2469, 2002.
M. Muller, D. Charypar, and M. Gross. Particle-based fluid simulation for interactive applications. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics 03, pages 154–159, 2003.
M. Müller, J. Stam, D. James, and N. Thürey. Real time physics: class notes. In SIGGRAPH '08: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 classes, pages 1–90, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. (doi:10.1145/1401132.1401245)
R. Nordahl. Auditory rendering of self-induced motion in virtual reality. M. Sc. project report, Dept. of Medialogy, Aalborg University Copenhagen, 2005.
R. Nordahl. Increasing the motion of users in photorealistic virtual environments by utilizing auditory rendering of the environment and ego-motion. Proceedings of Presence, pages 57–62, 2006.
Jeffrey A. Nystuen, Jr. Leo H. Ostwald, and Herman Medwin. The hydroacoustics of a raindrop impact. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(2):1017–1021, 1992.
S. O'Modhrain and G. Essl. PebbleBox and CrumbleBag: Tactile interfaces for granular synthesis. In Proc. NIME2004.
S. O'Modhrain and G. Essl. Pebblebox and crumblebag: Tactile interfaces for granular synthesis. In Proc. NIME 2004, pages 74–79, Hamamatsu, Japan, 2004.
S. Papetti, F. Avanzini, and D. Rocchesso. Energy and accuracy issues in numerical simulations of a non-linear impact model. In Proc. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-09), Como, Italy, September 2009.
A. Papoulis. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edition, 1984.
J. Paradiso, K. Hsiao, and E. Hu. Interactive Music for Instrumented Dancing Shoes. Proc. of the 1999 International Computer Music Conference, pages 453–456, 1999.
R. E. Pastore, J. D. Flint, J. R. Gaston, and M. J. Solomon. Auditory event perception: The source-perception loop for posture in human gait. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1):13–29, 2008.
A. Pelah and J. J. Koenderink. Editorial: Walking in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans. Applied Perception, 4(1), January 2007. Special issue on interactive walking.
L. Peltola, C. Erkut, P. R. Cook, and V. Välimäki. Synthesis of hand clapping sounds. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech and Language Proc., 15(3):1021–1029, 2007.
M. Puckette. Pure Data. In Second Intercollege Computer Music Concerts, pages 37–41, Tachikawa, Japan, 1996. Available at url http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/ msp/.
L. Pust and F. Peterka. Impact oscillator with Hertz's model of contact. Meccanica, 38(1):99–116, 2003.
A. Quarteroni, R. Sacco, and F. Saleri. Numerical Mathematics. Springer, 2nd edition, 2007.
M. Rath and D. Rocchesso. Continuous sonic feedback from a rolling ball. IEEE Multimedia, 12(2):60–69, 2005.
M. Rein. Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dynamics Research, 12(2):61–93, 1993.
B. H. Repp. The sound of two hands clapping: an exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(4):1100–1109, 1987.
D. Rocchesso and F. Fontana, editors. The Sounding Object. Edizioni di Mondo Estremo, Florence, Italy, 2003.
D. Rocchesso and F. Fontana, editors. The Sounding Object. Mondo Estremo, 2003. Available at http://www.soundobject.org/.
D. Rocchesso and L. Ottaviani. Can one hear the volume of a shape? In Proc. IEEE Workshop Appl. Sig. Proc. Audio and Ac., pages 115–118, Mohonk, NY, 2001.
D. Rocchesso, R. Bresin, and M. Fernström. Sounding objects. IEEE MultiMedia, 10(2):42–52, 2003. (doi:10.1109/MMUL.2003.1195160)
D. Rocchesso. Introduction to Sound Processing. Mondo Estremo, Florence, Italy, 2003. Online available at http://www.faqs.org/docs/sp/.
L. D. Rosenblum. Perceiving articulatory events: lessons for an ecological psychoacoustics. In J. G. Neuhoff, editor, Ecological psychoacoustics, pages 219–248. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2004.
M. Vincent Roussarie. Analyse perceptive de structures vibrantes simulees par modele physique. PhD thesis, Université du Maine, France, 1999.
S. Sadler. The Situationist City. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1998.
R.D. Sanders and M.A. Scorgie. The Effect of Sound Delivery Methods on a User's Sense of Presence in a Virtual Environment, 2002.
J. P. Sethna, K. A. Dahmen, and C. R. Myers. Crackling noise. Nature, (410):242–250, March 2001.
C. N. J. Stoelinga. A psychomechanical study of rolling sounds. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2007.
R. L. Storms and M. J. Zyda. Interactions in Perceived Quality of Auditory-Visual Displays. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(6):557–580, 2000.
A. Stulov. Dynamic behavior and mechanical features of wool felt. Acta Mechanica, 169(1):13–21, 2004.
S. Turner, P. Turner, F. Carroll, S. O'Neill, D. Benyon, R. McCall, and M. Smyth. Re-creating the Botanics: towards a sense of place in virtual environments. Environmental Science Conference, 2003.
A. Väljamäe, P. Larsson, D. Västfjäll, and M. Kleiner. Travelling without moving: Auditory scene cues for translational self-motion. Proceedings of ICADÕ05, 2005.
K. van den Doel, P. Kry, and K. Pai. Foleyautomatic: Physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 01, pages 537–544, 2001.
K. van den Doel, P.G. Kry, and D.K. Pai. FoleyAutomatic: physically-based sound effects for interactive simulation and animation. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 537–544, 2001.
K. van den Doel. Physically-based models for liquid sounds. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(4):534–546, 2005.
D. Vastfjall. The Subjective Sense of Presence, Emotion Recognition, and Experienced Emotions in Auditory Virtual Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(2):181–188, 2003.
L. Verlet. Computer "Experiments" on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules. Physical Review, 159(1):98+, July 1967.
Y. Visell, J. Cooperstock, and K. Franinovic. The ecotile: An architectural platform for audio-haptic simulation in walking. In Proc. of the 4th Intl. Conf. on Enactive Interfaces, 2007.
Y. Visell, J. Cooperstock, B. L. Giordano, K. Franinovic, A. Law, S. McAdams, K. Jathal, and F. Fontana. A vibrotactile device for display of virtual ground materials in walking. In Proc. of Eurohaptics 2008, 2008.
L. Vu-Quoc and X. Zhang. An elastoplastic contact force-displacement model in the normal direction: displacement-driven version. Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, pages 4013–4044, 1999.
W. H. Warren and R. R. Verbrugge. Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5):704–712, 1984.
B. G. Watters. Impact noise characteristics of female hard-heeled foot traffic. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 37:619–630, 1965.
G. Wu and J. H. Chiang. The effects of surface compliance on foot pressure in stance. Gait & Posture, 4(2):122–129, 1996.
Y.Dobashi, T.Yamamoto, and T.Nishita. Real-time rendering of aerodynamic sound using sound textures based on computational fluid dynamics. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 22(3 (Proc. SIGGRAPH2003)):732–740, 2003.
Scopes and Aims
The NIW Project
Minutes
periodicreport_6_0.pdf (~3.1Mb)
